In the case of claims for mass torts, a single law firm can represent several plaintiffs. This is quite common in the legal world. It helps in the collection of resources and information. Instead of many legal firms representing a single plaintiff, who is investigating the litigation claim and collecting the relevant evidence, another law firm can carry out a deeper investigation that benefits all the plaintiffs connected to the case.
David Cates – working together for the greater good
David Cates is a seasoned trial lawyer from Swansea, Illinois, in the USA. He strongly advocates union rights that include the Illinois Prevailing Wage Act. He has a sole mission of protecting the legal rights of individuals and their families who have been victims of fraud and deception by corporates in the USA. Additionally, he offers specialized services to individuals that have suffered a personal injury due to corporate greed. He focuses on globally recognized complex cases about personal injury, including mass tort suits, class action, civil rights, and employment discrimination.
What do you mean by a tort?
He says before understanding what mass torts are, it is important to comprehend the definition of a tort. A tort refers to a civil (it is not criminal) wrongdoing that has been committed by a company or an individual that resulted in some harm to the other person. This harm can be a physical injury, damage to the property, financial loss, or emotional distress. The entity or the individual that commits the tort is known as the “tortfeasor” and is accountable legally for the wrong caused to the victim or the victims.
The legal effects of mass torts
When it comes to mass torts, he says there are many situations where many legal firms work together to benefit all the plaintiffs. This is perfect when there are several plaintiffs for a single form to manage, and they are spread all across the nation. While these firms might have different clients, he states that all of them have one single goal that is the same- to get the maximum compensation for clients that have been affected either via a settlement with the concerned defendant or an award granted by the jury.
Besides the above, he says that in the case of mass tort claims that are the same, they can also be consolidated into a single or some jurisdictions across the nation. This, in turn, ensures better use of the judiciary’s system when it comes to saving both time and resources, he says.
In the opinion of David Cates the mass tort action is not the same as a class action. In the former, every plaintiff has an individual claim due to the distinct damage caused, and each of them gets their separate trial. On the other hand, multiple plaintiffs are not considered individually for a class action as there is just a single trial. Similarly, the recovery for these individual victims is much higher over mass tort actions than in a class tort suit.